Skip to Main Content

Download official copy

IN REPLY REFER TO: ______________
FILE NO: ______________

December 11, 2019

Re:       _______________________ – Opinion Request

 

Dear Mr. ________:

Thank you for your letter dated July 20, 2019 to the Department of Business Oversight (“Department”) and your recent letter received on November 26, 2019. Your letter requests confirmation that _____________ (“__________”) is not currently required to obtain a license under the California Money Transmission Act in connection with its proposed business activities in California.

According to your letter, __________ is a Georgia corporation doing business as ­­­­___________. __________ operates kiosks for the purpose of selling cryptocurrency that it holds in its own inventory, to consumers for fiat currency. __________ also purchases cryptocurrency from consumers for its own inventory through the kiosks. Transactions occur in the following manner: To purchase cryptocurrency, a consumer inserts fiat currency into the kiosk, and __________ transfers the appropriate amount of cryptocurrency from its digital wallet to the consumer’s digital wallet. To sell cryptocurrency, a consumer transfers the cryptocurrency from his or her wallet directly to __________’s wallet and receives fiat currency from the kiosk. The cryptocurrency becomes part of __________’s inventory. Currently, __________ supports the exchange of Bitcoin, Ethereum, and Litecoin.

The Department has been studying the cryptocurrency industry closely. Whether Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies are a viable form of money or a speculative non-money asset is widely debated. Given this ongoing debate, the Department has not concluded whether Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies are a form of money.

Notwithstanding the foregoing, the sale and purchase of Bitcoin, Ethereum, and Litecoin by __________ out of its own inventory through a kiosk, which does not support any other types of transactions, does not meet the definition of “receiving money for transmission.”[1] Therefore, __________’s activities in connection with its kiosks are not subject to licensing under the MTA.

While not the subject of your inquiry, if in the future __________ offers customers the ability to purchase and sell cryptocurrencies other than Bitcoin, Ethereum, and Litecoin, to the extent that any of those other cryptocurrencies are securities, __________ may have obligations under California’s broker-dealer laws. The Department reserves the right to take administrative action against __________ if it is later determined that __________ is trading securities in violation of California law.

Nothing in this letter should be interpreted to relieve __________ from any obligations under the laws administered by FinCEN or any other agency of the federal government.

Please contact me at __________ if you have any questions.

 

Sincerely,

 

Manuel P. Alvarez

Commissioner

Department of Business Oversight

 

By

__________________

Pamela F. Hernandez

Counsel

 

PFH:ss

 

[1] Fin. Code, § 2003, subd. (u) (defining “receiving money for transmission” to mean receiving money or monetary value in the United States for transmission within or outside of the United States).

Stay Connected

Receive financial alerts, insights, and tips for improving your wealth.

Subscribe